[ 周成泓 ]——(2005-10-9) / 已閱19554次
[6] 王生長. SCC規則和CIETAC規則的比較[A].中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會.中國涉外年刊[C],1992,59-60.
[7] Michael E. Schneider, Combining Arbitration with Conciliation, ICCA Congress Series no.8,ibid.,p.76.
[8] Street Laurence, The Language Dispute Resolution (1992) 66 Australia Law Journal,194,p.197.
[9] Goldberg, Green and Sander,Dispute Resolution,pp.246-267.
[10] David C. Elliott, Med-Arb: Fraught with Danger or Ripe with Opportunity? 62 Arbitration (August 1996),p.177.
[11] Roger Pitchforth, National Report-New Zealand, speech delivered at the Nagoya Symposiun,ibid,pp.411 and 432.
[12] [日]棚瀨孝雄.糾紛的解決與審判制度[M].王亞新譯,北京：中國政法大學出版社,1996,27-35,107－108,80,104.
[13] 同上,107-108.
[14] 同上,80,104.
[15] 季衛東.法治秩序的建構[M].北京：法律出版社,1999,385.
[16] 陳瑞華.程序正義初論[ A].陳光中,江偉.訴訟法論叢（第一卷）[C].北京：法律出版社,1998.
[17] 陳桂明.程序理念與程序規則[M].北京：中國法制出版社,1999,2.
On Rationality of Arb-Med
ZHOU Cheng-hong
(South West University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031)
Abstract: The article deals with the definition of arb-med, then analyzes the pro-viewpoints and con-viewpoints, pointing out that there are three focus of the argumentation about it ,i.e.due process and efficiency .Finally the article introduces the “acquirement of dual agreement”theory and applies it for demonstrating the rationality of arb-med.
Key Words: arb-med; acquirement of dual agreement; rationality
總共2頁 [1] 2
上一頁
